Realist is The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royalty and the royal family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.
Prince Harry faces a life of permanent “exile”, with King Charles planning to follow the royally-crafted playbook to overcome the crisis triggered by Edward VIII, the king who abdicated in 1936 and was forced to live out the rest of his life outside the country. UK, The Daily Beast understands.
A friend of the king told The Daily Beast: “The royals dealt with the abdication crisis by exiling Edward, which meant that he and Wallis ended up looking like unimportant, misguided, disloyal and even treacherous individuals to almost all of the British people. It was a masterful operation in the service of which the Queen Mother, in particular, worked tirelessly.
“The same thing is already happening with Harry and Meghan, and it will only pick up pace in the coming years under King Charles. And of course a rebellious second son is a far less existential threat to the structure of the monarchy than a rebellious king.”
Another source, a former Buckingham Palace official, told The Daily Beast that King Charles’ declaration of accession, in which he encouraged his son and Meghan to “continue to build their lives abroad” was an undisguised message to them. not interrupt his reign by making frequent trips to the UK
“Harry and Meghan will receive an invitation to the coronation, but will be firmly seated in the cheap seats along with Beatrice and Eugenie, as they were at the funeral. It will be. Charles will be relentless when it comes to protecting the Crown, and that means keeping Harry and Meghan as far away from the center of gravity as possible.”
The news follows the revelation, reported by Sun On Thursday night, Harry snubbed Charles’ dinner offer the night he was at Balmoral following the death of Queen Elizabeth, after Charles banned Meghan from joining Harry at Balmoral.
Instead of joining Charles, Camilla and William for dinner at Charles’ home on Balmoral’s Birkhall estate, Harry stayed with Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and his wife Sophie at Balmoral Castle itself.
A source said: “Harry was so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and rowing with his family that he missed his flight. Charles has an open invitation for Harry to have dinner with him whenever he is in the country. But Harry was so furious that he refused to eat with his father and brother. It was great contempt. And he left Balmoral at the first opportunity to catch the first commercial flight back to London.”
Although it was the couple themselves who made the decision to move to America, they envisioned a transcontinental role for themselves. As they said in their first departure announcement, “we now plan to balance our time between the UK and North America.”
They were equally open about their desire to continue to “represent” the monarchy while still earning their own money.
This plan was rejected by the Queen at the so-called Sandringham Summit, where the couple were told they could not play any role in public life as part-time royalty.
A palace statement at the time said the queen had told the couple “that stepping away from the work of the royal family it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that accompany a life of public service”.
In response, Harry and Meghan basically said, “Oh yes we can,” issuing a statement that read: “We can all live a life of service. The service is universal.”
While the Queen has not ordered them to live abroad, the travel shutdown caused by the pandemic, which hit the world just weeks after leaving the royal family, and the birth of baby Lilibet, have essentially put a stop to the issue. of them traveling to and from the UK for two years.
little surprise that vanity fair Katie Nicholl, in her new book the new kingssays William and Kate felt “relief” when Harry and Meghan announced their decision to move to the US, because they felt the “drama was over”.
However, the widely held idea that they have given up the idea of having a significant role in British public life is not correct. Indeed, Harry has explicitly made it clear in a legal action he is bringing against the British government, seeking automatic police protection when in the UK, that he still sees the UK as his home and wants to operate here.
In a presentation made in January of this year, Harry’s legal team said: “The UK will always be Prince Harry’s home and a country where he wants his wife and children to be safe. .”
At a hearing in February, Harry’s lawyer said: “It goes without saying that he wants to come back to see family and friends and continue to support the charities that are so close to his heart.”
The idea of Harry showing up every few weeks to make public appearances is likely to give Charles the chills.
So while the decision on Harry’s safety is, strictly speaking, a matter for the courts, it’s probably safe to rule out the establishment pulling strings to get what Harry wants.
Charles’ advisers will be mindful of the fact that when Harry and Meghan arrived in the UK earlier this month, having announced what was supposed to be a four-day trip to support charities “close to their hearts” (that phrase again ) completely dominated real news feeds for days on end.
This trip became a source of intense irritation at the palace, with insiders irritated by the couple performing engagements that seemed indistinguishable from their former royal duties.
Then, of course, the queen died, which means the four-day tour became a two-week-plus epic – the couple finally flew home with their children on Tuesday, September 20, Page Six reported, having arrived, it is believed, on Sunday, 4 September.
A reasonable interpretation of Harry’s treatment in the days after the Queen’s death and at her funeral is that it was part of a strategy to downplay Harry, to reframe him in the public eye as “Prince Harry, sixth in the line of succession.” the Throne” to “Prince Harry, Minor, Non-Working Royalty Living Abroad”.
If Harry and Meghan have tried to blur the lines, through charitable commitments, between their current identity as private citizens and their former identity as royalty, the past two weeks have offered the palace an unprecedented opportunity to turn them back into stark relief.
The most graphic illustration of this was the seating arrangement at the Queen’s funeral, which humiliatingly denied Harry a front-row seat in favor of his cousins Peter and Zara Philips. Palace sources insisted the seats were decided purely in order of age and that “there was no contempt” involved.
Harry’s expression and his reluctance to sing “God Save the King” suggested that he saw things differently, understanding full well that for the King’s second son to be second-row in favor of his cousins based on his age was , if not contempt, certainly a massive recalibration of the royal hierarchy, which has traditionally granted privilege in the order of precedence.
This was just a final reminder of Harry’s new humble and strange status. The tone was set on the day of the Queen’s death, when no seats were found for Harry on the military jet that transported William, Andrew and Edward to the Queen’s deathbed in Scotland, with Harry being forced to take a private plane chartered from a civil airport, Luton, over an hour from London, and being informed of his grandmother’s death just five minutes before the world at large was informed.
After not being invited to dinner with Charles, or – as the Sun reports – refusing, Harry left Balmoral early to fly home on a scheduled BA service. He was later ordered not to wear uniform for any of the ceremonial events before Charles highlighted the fact that it was completely in his gift to allow him to wear uniform if he so wished, ordering Harry to wear uniform during his vigil for the Queen.
“There is genuine nervousness about the impact his memoir – now thought to be delayed after the Queen’s death, but this has not been confirmed – could have on the King.”
Before the Queen’s death, tempers were stirred by Meghan’s inflammatory interview with The cut in which she implicitly threatened to reveal more secrets about her time in the royal family.
However, there is a perception in the palace that Meghan’s attacks on the monarchy can be ignored and that they are failing. The all-important British public seems to have largely decided that she is not credible, mainly due to the fact that she has made some bizarre claims in interviews, such as her inexplicable comment comparing her marriage to the release of Nelson Mandela, which the British media then skipped. and they put on a great show of forensic separation.
Harry represents an entirely different level of threat. There is genuine nervousness about the impact his memoir – now thought to be delayed after the Queen’s death, but this has not been confirmed – could have on the King if he decides to launch a serious attack on Charles, which many inside fear he will.
One explanation for the relentless messages over the past two weeks that Harry is now firmly out of the royal club, as are his offspring, could be that this undermines Harry’s status as the last insider before the book is released.
Prince Charles’ office declined to comment on the allegations made in this article when contacted by The Daily Beast.
While there is no reason to doubt, on a personal level, the palace’s unofficial line that Charles loves Harry and desires nothing more than to reconcile with his son, the staff will now take second place to Charles’ priority; preserving the Crown.
Harry and Meghan are one big distraction that the royals don’t need. Charles wants them out of sight and out of mind. So he’s likely to feel a lot more comfortable if Harry and Meghan are safely on the other side of the world – forever and ever, amen.
Source : www.thedailybeast.com